Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: Visualizing and characterizing excited states from time-dependent density functional theory

John M. Herbert
Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA. E-mail: herbert@chemistry.ohio-state.edu

Received 30th July 2024 , Accepted 30th July 2024

First published on 23rd August 2024


Abstract

Correction for ‘Visualizing and characterizing excited states from time-dependent density functional theory’ by John M. Herbert et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2024, 26, 3755–3794, https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CP04226J.


My recent review1 on visualization and characterization methods in time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) contains a sign error in the definition of the natural transition orbitals. This affects eqn (3.1) and (3.2) and the accompanying text in the same paragraph. The corrected equations are
 
image file: d4cp90138j-t1.tif(3.1)
and
 
image file: d4cp90138j-t2.tif(3.2)
These eigenvalues differ in sign from what was (erroneously) published in ref. 1. The text accompanying these equations should suggest that ΔPelec is positive semidefinite (eigenvalues λ2i ≥ 0) whereas ΔPhole is negative semidefinite (eigenvalues −λ2i). This is consistent with the signs in eqn (2.12) that defines ΔPelec and ΔPhole, and with remarks made concerning the attachment and detachment densities in eqn (2.17).

In addition, eqn (2.13) for the normalization of the electron and hole densities holds only when the Tamm–Dancoff approximation (TDA) is invoked. A more general statement is that

tr(ΔPelec) = −tr(ΔPhole)
always, consistent with the eigenvalues given above, whereas
image file: d4cp90138j-t3.tif
holds only within the TDA. Note that
image file: d4cp90138j-t4.tif
according to eqn (2.12), whereas the normalization condition for linear response TD-DFT is image file: d4cp90138j-t5.tif [eqn (2.4)]. Therefore, tr(ΔPelec) can exceed unity for full linear response TDDFT. Typically ||y|| ∼ 10−3 for small molecules, so the deviation from the TDA result is not large.

The funding information in the Acknowledgments section of the original article was incomplete, the full funding information is shown here.

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Science Foundation grants CHE-1665322, CHE-1955282 and CHE-2402361.

Notes and references

  1. J. M. Herbert, Visualizing and characterizing excited states from time-dependent density functional theory, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2024, 26, 3755–3794 RSC .

This journal is © the Owner Societies 2024