Quantum tunnelling dominates chloride leaching from polyvinyl chloride

Gbolagade Olajide and Tibor Szilvási*
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA. E-mail: tibor.szilvasi@ua.edu

Received 15th July 2024 , Accepted 30th August 2024

First published on 2nd September 2024


Abstract

Chloride leaching/removal is a fundamental reaction of polyvinyl chloride (PVC), pertinent to PVC recycling and environmental impacts. We show that quantum tunnelling (QT) drives >90% of chloride leaching from PVC to water at all environmentally relevant temperatures offering new insights into plastic degradation and transformation processes.


Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) is the world's third-most produced plastic, accounting for over 10% of total plastics production,1 and is used in wide-ranging applications including pipes, roofs, flooring, cables, valves, and medical equipment, among others.2,3 PVC pipes have even surpassed metal pipes as the dominant material for new water systems in the USA.4 As PVC is in contact with water in most applications, concerns have been raised over the possibility of PVC leaching chemicals into water, such as chloride.5 In addition, plastic waste recycling efforts have also emphasized the necessity of chlorine removal for successful PVC upcycling.1,3,6 Previous studies have established that chloride leaching/removal proceeds via an E2 mechanism (Fig. 1) in a basic environment.7,8 The E2 mechanism involves a concerted abstraction of a proton by the hydroxide from a CH2 group and a chloride ion leaving from the adjacent CHCl group. The reaction results in the formation of a C[double bond, length as m-dash]C double bond in the polymer backbone, a water molecule, and a chloride ion. This E2 mechanism occurs when PVC pipes are in contact with alkaline soils or when PVC waste is recycled using NaOH.9
image file: d4cc03489a-f1.tif
Fig. 1 E2 mechanism of base-assisted chloride leaching from PVC.

In this computational study, we consider the base-assisted chloride leaching from PVC to water with a focus on understanding the effect of quantum tunnelling on the reaction. Quantum tunnelling (QT) is the phenomenon by which particles bypass a potential energy barrier instead of surmounting it. QT provides an alternative pathway for reactants to transform into products and results in a higher reaction rate than that expected from thermal barriers.10 QT has been proven to be relevant for various reactions,11–15 including enzyme catalysis,16–18 organic reactions,12,19–23 and surface reactions.24–26 QT has also been studied in a few free-radical mediated reactions of plastics such as free-radical polymerization27,28 and poly-α-methylstyrene degradation,29 using approximate methods such as the non-uniformized Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin (WKB) approximation30–32 and the one-dimensional Eckart tunnelling method.33 In this paper, we show using reliable canonical variational theory10,34,35 (CVT) calculations coupled with the small curvature tunnelling34,36 (SCT) approximation that the base-assisted chloride leaching from PVC is dominated by QT at all practically relevant temperatures. By establishing the role of QT in chloride leaching from PVC, we show a practical example for tunnelling in plastic polymers in a non-radical mediated reaction and reveal that QT can contribute to plastic waste recycling.

We study the chloride leaching to water in a two-monomer unit computational model based on our benchmarking studies (see details in Section S1 of the ESI). In our model, a hydroxide ion formally reacts with 1,3-dichlorobutane to form 1-chloro-2-butene, water, and a chloride ion. The transition state related to chloride leaching via the E2 mechanism is shown in Fig. 2 at ωB97X-D(SMD = Water)/6-311+G(d,p)37–40 level of theory. The C–H bond at the transition state elongates from the equilibrium 1.095 Å to 1.359 Å, while the C–Cl bond distance changes from 1.841 Å to 2.157 Å. This suggests that the C–H and the C–Cl bond breaking are fully concerted, and Cl also actively participates in the transition state. The analysis of the imaginary mode indicates that the reacting hydrogen is displaced much more than the heavier chlorine as the displacement values in normal coordinates are 0.99 and 0.014 for hydrogen and chlorine, respectively. Notably, all other nuclei also undergo negligible displacement (<0.1) relative to hydrogen. The displacement analysis suggests that the motion of the leaving hydrogen is critical during the chloride leaching process, hence, if QT is present in the reaction, it will be primarily driven by the involvement of the hydrogen in the elementary step.


image file: d4cc03489a-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Transition state of the base-assisted chloride leaching in the two monomer-unit model at ωB97X-D(SMD = Water)/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory. Colour code: C – gray, H – white, O – red, and Cl − green.

We present the calculated standard-state energetics such as the reaction energy (ΔER), reaction Gibbs free energy (ΔGR), electronic energy barrier (ΔE), and Gibbs free energy barrier (ΔG) in Table 1. ΔER (−20.6 kcal mol−1) and ΔGR (−30.9 kcal mol−1) show that chloride leaching is thermodynamically favorable. The reaction has a relatively high barrier as indicated by ΔE and ΔG of 17.9 and 23.0 kcal mol−1, respectively. ΔG suggests a low thermal reaction rate at room temperature; however, it is important to note that PVC pipes can be in contact with water for decades. We also find that some of the reaction energetics hint at a possible role of QT in the reaction. The large thermodynamic driving force together with the large imaginary mode of the transition state (1491 cm−1) indicate a narrow barrier that is pertinent for QT as QT has an inverse dependence on barrier width.13

Table 1 Computed standard-state reaction energy (ΔER), reaction Gibbs free energy (ΔGR), electronic energy barrier (ΔE), and Gibbs free energy barrier (ΔG) in kcal mol−1; semiclassical rate constant (kCVT) and QT-corrected rate constant (kSCT) in s−1, the transition state imaginary frequency (νi) in cm−1, SCT transmission coefficient (κ), and Tunnelling contributions (%Tun) for chloride leaching from the two monomer-unit model at ωB97X-D(SMD = Water)/6-311+G(d,p) level
ΔER −20.6 kcal mol−1
ΔGR −30.9 kcal mol−1
ΔE 17.9 kcal mol−1
ΔG 23.0 kcal mol−1
νi 1491 cm−1
kCVT 2.8 s−1
kSCT 39.2 s−1
κ 13.9
%Tun 93%


We explore the possible role of QT by carrying out CVT calculations coupled with the SCT approximation. We use well-converged parameters and compute the minimum energy path (MEP) long enough to completely cover the region where tunnelling occurs (see details in Section S1 of the ESI). We calculate the semiclassical standard-state rate constant (kCVT) as 2.8 s−1 and the QT-corrected rate constant (kSCT) as 39.2 s−1. Thus, the transmission coefficient (κ) is 13.9 at room temperature. Since QT rates depend on temperature, we calculate kCVT, kSCT, and κ from 70 K to 350 K for completeness (presented in Table S5 in the ESI). Fig. S1 (ESI) shows kCVT and kSCT plotted against temperatures from 220 K to 350 K. We see that κ decreases with increasing temperature as expected (see Table S5 for more details, ESI) due to the stronger increase of thermal rates than tunnelling rates. Notably, κ is still 6.98 even at 350 K; thus, QT is important even at elevated temperatures. In Fig. S2 (ESI), we present an Arrhenius plot for kCVT and kSCT between 70 K and 350 K. ln(kCVT) shows a linear change throughout the temperature range. From about 220 K to 350 K, QT occurs from vibrationally-excited levels, so ln(kSCT) also changes linearly. However, below 200 K, QT mainly occurs from the vibrational ground state, reducing the temperature-dependence of kSCT. Fig. S3 (ESI) magnifies the linear region of Fig. S2 (ESI), showing that the effective barrier determined from the Arrhenius plot of kSCT is 13.3 kcal mol−1, 3.2 kcal mol−1 lower than that obtained from the Arrhenius plot of kCVT.

We present the calculated vibrationally adiabatic ground-state energy curve of the minimum energy path (VGa) in Fig. 3 to elucidate the contribution of tunnelling to the thermal reaction. The VGa curve is shown from s = −4 to s = +4 bohr amu−1/2, whereby s represents the mass-weighted reaction coordinate, and the colouring scheme refers to the tunnelling probability. We note that we observe some small (mostly below 50 cm−1) imaginary frequencies along the VGa curve generally far away from the transition state and thus they should not affect the accuracy of our results. Furthermore, the plotted VGa curve approaches but does not reach the reactants and products; this is however unimportant as the shown VGa curve includes the region with non-negligible tunnelling probability (see Section S1 of the ESI for more details). 96% of all the tunnelling occurs in the shaded region magnified in the inset that spans from s = −1.0 to s = +0.8 bohr amu−1/2. Thus, all the tunnelling in the reaction occurs within 4.0 kcal mol−1 of the transition state and the tunnelling probabilities increase with decreasing barrier width,14,41 reaching a maximum of 0.5.42


image file: d4cc03489a-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Vibrationally adiabatic ground-state energy curve of the minimum energy path (VGa) as a function of the calculated mass-scaled reaction coordinate (s) at ωB97X-D(SMD = Water)/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory for the two monomer-unit model. The vertical axis of the inset is the vibrationally adiabatic ground-state energy relative to the transition state, and the vertical axis of the figure is the vibrationally adiabatic ground-state energy relative to the reactant's potential energy. The values on the colour scale are the tunnelling probabilities.

We analyse the tunnelling contribution (%Tun) to chloride leaching at various temperatures. Fig. 4 presents the variation of %Tun between 220 K and 350 K and demonstrates that QT dominates chloride leaching reaction rates at all shown temperatures. At room temperature, QT is responsible for 93% of the chloride leaching rate and the thermal pathway only accounts for 7% of the reaction rate. %Tun decreases with increasing temperature similar to κ, however, it still accounts for 86% of the reaction rate at 350 K whereas it is responsible for 99+% of the reaction rate below 220 K (Table S5, ESI). Overall, Fig. 4 indicates that QT provides the pathway for Cl to leach from PVC to water at all environmentally relevant temperatures.


image file: d4cc03489a-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Tunnelling contribution (%Tun) to the reaction rate for the two monomer-unit model as a function of temperature in K.

To discern which atom is tunnelling, we perform kinetic isotope effects (KIE) analyses. On substituting deuterium for the leaving H, we calculate a H/D KIE of 23.18 at 298 K. At room temperature, a H/D KIE > 7 generally cannot be explained only by differences in the zero-point energy of the H and D isotopologues.14 We also calculate a Cl35/Cl37 KIE of 2.51 at 298 K on substituting the leaving Cl, and a C12/C14 KIE of 2.47 at 298 K on substituting the C bonded to the leaving H. Our KIE analysis indicates that although QT in the reaction is driven by H-tunnelling, the other atoms might also contribute.

To test the validity of the SMD model for OH, we also carry out electronic structure and tunnelling calculations at the ωB97X-D(SMD = Water)/6-311+G(d,p) level on a two monomer-unit model with an explicit water molecule present (Section S4 of the ESI). We show that an explicit water molecule does not affect our conclusions as %Tun changes only slightly to 86% at 298 K.

In conclusion, we provide computational evidence that QT plays a critical role in chloride leaching from PVC to water. We show that QT increases the reaction rate of chloride leaching by an order of magnitude by lowering the effective barrier by 3.2 kcal mol−1. The present work highlights that QT is of a practical importance given the environmental relevance of chloride leaching. Our study also indicate that QT is an important phenomenon in PVC recycling, where removal of chlorine is desired under a controlled environment via the same reaction mechanism. We anticipate that QT may play a role in other plastic transformations relevant to the environmental impact of plastics and related global plastic recycling efforts, which are being explored further by our research group.

G. O. and T. S. would like to acknowledge financial support from the National Science Foundation (NSF) under grants EFMA-2132133, EFMA-2029387, and 2339481. G. O. would like to acknowledge the financial support of the University of Alabama Graduate School as a Graduate Council Fellow. The authors thank Khagendra Baral, Sophia Ezendu, Tristan Maxson, and Ademola Soyemi for their insightful comments on the manuscript. This research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility located at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, operated under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 using NERSC award BES-ERCAP0024218.

Data availability

Sample input files for electronic structure and tunnelling calculations, geometries of optimized structures, and further details on the benchmarking of the basis set, functional, computational model, and tunnelling calculations can be found in the ESI.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

References

  1. H. Li, H. A. Aguirre-Villegas, R. D. Allen, X. Bai, C. H. Benson, G. T. Beckham, S. L. Bradshaw, J. L. Brown, R. C. Brown and V. S. Cecon, Expanding plastics recycling technologies: chemical aspects, technology status and challenges, Green Chem., 2022, 24(23), 8899–9002 RSC .
  2. P. Lieberzeit, D. Bekchanov and M. Mukhamediev, Polyvinyl chloride modifications, properties, and applications, Polym. Adv. Technol., 2022, 33(6), 1809–1820 CrossRef CAS .
  3. K. Lewandowski and K. Skórczewska, A brief review of poly (vinyl chloride)(PVC) recycling, Polymers, 2022, 14(15), 3035 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  4. B. Walker, North America's Cinderella Pipe Story: A Look at PVC Pipes’ Climb to the Top, in Plastic Pipe and Fittings: Past, Present, and Future, ed. T. Walsh, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM International), 2011 Search PubMed .
  5. J. Świetlik and M. Magnucka, Chemical and microbiological safety of drinking water in distribution networks made of plastic pipes, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Water, 2024, 11(2), e1704 CrossRef .
  6. Q. Hu, Z. Zhang, D. He, J. Wu, J. Ding, Q. Chen, X. Jiao and Y. Xie, Progress and Perspective for “Green” Strategies of Catalytic Plastics Conversion into Fuels by Regulating Half-Reactions, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2024, 146(25), 16950–16962 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  7. S. Ezendu, A. Soyemi and T. Szilvasi, Multiscale Simulation of Plastic Transformations: The Case of Base-Assisted Dehydrochlorination of Polyvinyl Chloride, AIChE J., 2024, e18559,  DOI:10.1002/aic.18559 .
  8. T. Yoshioka, T. Kameda, S. Imai and A. Okuwaki, Dechlorination of poly (vinyl chloride) using NaOH in ethylene glycol under atmospheric pressure, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 2008, 93(6), 1138–1141 CrossRef CAS .
  9. A. Al Alshaikh and J. E. Bara, Chlorinated plastics offer unique opportunities and challenges in upcycling, Polym. Int., 2024, 73(5), 341–348,  DOI:10.1002/pi.6621 .
  10. J. L. Bao and D. G. Truhlar, Variational transition state theory: theoretical framework and recent developments, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46(24), 7548–7596 RSC .
  11. E. M. Greer, V. Siev, A. Segal, A. Greer and C. Doubleday, Computational evidence for tunneling and a hidden intermediate in the biosynthesis of tetrahydrocannabinol, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144(17), 7646–7656 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  12. A. Frenklach, H. Amlani and S. Kozuch, Quantum Tunneling Instability in Pericyclic Reactions, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2024, 146(17), 11823–11834,  DOI:10.1021/jacs.4c00608 .
  13. P. R. Schreiner, Quantum mechanical tunneling is essential to understanding chemical reactivity, Trends Chem., 2020, 2(11), 980–989 CrossRef CAS .
  14. J. Meisner and J. Kästner, Atom tunneling in chemistry, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2016, 55(18), 5400–5413 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  15. W. T. Borden, Reactions that involve tunneling by carbon and the role that calculations have played in their study, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci., 2016, 6(1), 20–46 CAS .
  16. A. Nandi, G. Molpeceres, P. K. Gupta, D. T. Major, J. Kästner, J. M. Martin and S. Kozuch, Quantum Tunneling in Computational Catalysis and Kinetics: Is it Really Important?, Comprehensive Computational Chemistry, Elsevier, 2024, pp 713–734 Search PubMed .
  17. J. C. Brookes, Quantum effects in biology: golden rule in enzymes, olfaction, photosynthesis and magnetodetection, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 2017, 473(2201), 20160822 Search PubMed .
  18. R. K. Allemann and N. S. Scrutton, Quantum tunnelling in enzyme-catalysed reactions, Royal Society of Chemistry, 2009 Search PubMed .
  19. C. Castro and W. L. Karney, Heavy-Atom Tunneling in Organic Reactions, Angew. Chem., 2020, 132(22), 8431–8442 CrossRef .
  20. C. Doubleday, R. Armas, D. Walker, C. V. Cosgriff and E. M. Greer, Heavy-Atom Tunneling Calculations in Thirteen Organic Reactions: Tunneling Contributions are Substantial, and Bell's Formula Closely Approximates Multidimensional Tunneling at ≥ 250 K, Angew. Chem., 2017, 129(42), 13279–13282 CrossRef .
  21. E. M. Greer, K. Kwon, A. Greer and C. Doubleday, Thermally activated tunneling in organic reactions, Tetrahedron, 2016, 72(47), 7357–7373 CrossRef CAS .
  22. C. K. Bennett, M. N. Bhagat, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Raghuraman, M. E. Belowich, S. T. Nguyen, J. M. Notestein and L. J. Broadbelt, Strong influence of the nucleophile on the rate and selectivity of 1, 2-epoxyoctane ring opening catalyzed by tris (pentafluorophenyl) borane, B (C6F5) 3, ACS Catal., 2019, 9(12), 11589–11602 CrossRef CAS .
  23. W. Guo, E. E. Robinson, R. J. Thomson and D. J. Tantillo, Heavy Atom Quantum Mechanical Tunneling in Total Synthesis, Org. Lett., 2024, 26(22), 4606–4609,  DOI:10.1021/acs.orglett.4c01152 .
  24. B. Jackson and S. Nave, The dissociative chemisorption of methane on Ni (111): The effects of molecular vibration and lattice motion, J. Chem. Phys., 2013, 138, 17 CrossRef PubMed .
  25. G. Kyriakou, E. R. Davidson, G. Peng, L. T. Roling, S. Singh, M. B. Boucher, M. D. Marcinkowski, M. Mavrikakis, A. Michaelides and E. C. H. Sykes, Significant quantum effects in hydrogen activation, ACS Nano, 2014, 8(5), 4827–4835 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  26. E. D. German and M. Sheintuch, Kinetics of Catalytic OH Dissociation on Metal Surfaces, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116(9), 5700–5709,  DOI:10.1021/jp2106499 .
  27. D. Cuccato, M. Dossi, D. Polino, C. Cavallotti and D. Moscatelli, Is Quantum Tunneling Relevant in Free-Radical Polymerization?, Macromol. React. Eng., 2012, 6(12), 496–506 CrossRef CAS .
  28. J. Purmova, K. F. Pauwels, W. Van Zoelen, E. J. Vorenkamp, A. J. Schouten and M. L. Coote, New insight into the formation of structural defects in poly (vinyl chloride), Macromolecules, 2005, 38(15), 6352–6366 CrossRef CAS .
  29. Y. Zhu, X. Yang, F. Yu, R. Wang, Q. Chen, Z. Zhang and Z. Wang, Quantum tunneling of hydrogen atom transfer affects mandrel degradation in inertial confinement fusion target fabrication, Iscience, 2022, 25(1), 103674 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  30. G. Wentzel, Eine verallgemeinerung der quantenbedingungen für die zwecke der wellenmechanik, Z. Phys., 1926, 38(6), 518–529 CrossRef .
  31. H. A. Kramers, Wellenmechanik und halbzahlige Quantisierung, Z. Phys., 1926, 39(10), 828–840 CrossRef .
  32. L. Brillouin, La mécanique ondulatoire de Schrodinger; une methode generale de résolution par approximations successives, CR Acad. Sci., 1926, 183(11), 24–26 Search PubMed .
  33. C. Eckart, The penetration of a potential barrier by electrons, Phys. Rev., 1930, 35(11), 1303 CrossRef CAS .
  34. D. G. Truhlar, Semiclassical Multidimensional Tunnelling Calculations, Tunnelling Mol., 2020, 261–282 Search PubMed .
  35. D. G. Truhlar and B. C. Garrett, Variational transition-state theory, Acc. Chem. Res., 1980, 13(12), 440–448 CrossRef CAS .
  36. Y. P. Liu, G. C. Lynch, T. N. Truong, D. H. Lu, D. G. Truhlar and B. C. Garrett, Molecular modeling of the kinetic isotope effect for the [1, 5]-sigmatropic rearrangement of cis-1, 3-pentadiene, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115(6), 2408–2415 CrossRef CAS .
  37. J.-D. Chai and M. Head-Gordon, Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom–atom dispersion corrections, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2008, 10(44), 6615–6620,  10.1039/B810189B .
  38. T. Clark, J. Chandrasekhar, G. W. Spitznagel and P. V. R. Schleyer, Efficient diffuse function-augmented basis sets for anion calculations. III. The 3-21+G basis set for first-row elements, Li–F, J. Comput. Chem., 1983, 4(3), 294–301 CrossRef CAS .
  39. A. McLean and G. Chandler, Contracted Gaussian basis sets for molecular calculations. I. Second row atoms, Z = 11–18, J. Chem. Phys., 1980, 72(10), 5639–5648 CrossRef CAS .
  40. A. V. Marenich, C. J. Cramer and D. G. Truhlar, Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2009, 113(18), 6378–6396 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  41. G. Qiu and P. R. Schreiner, The Intrinsic Barrier Width and Its Role in Chemical Reactivity, ACS Cent. Sci., 2023, 9(11), 2129–2137 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  42. J. Kästner, Theory and simulation of atom tunneling in chemical reactions, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci., 2014, 4(2), 158–168 Search PubMed .

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Electronic structure and tunnelling calculations, geometries of optimized structures, and further details on the benchmarking of the basis set, functional, computational model, and tunnelling calculations. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4cc03489a

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024